RAW vs JPG and New Art for July 2014

New Art for July 2014

The Texas Longhorn Bull

Little known facts about the breed.

Genetic analyses show the Longhorn originated from an Iberian hybrid of two ancient cattle lineages: "taurine" descending from the domestication of the wild aurochs in the Middle East, and "indicine", descending from the domestication of the aurochs in India 85% and 15% respectively by proportion.

This shot was taken in Auto mode, thus the blown out background after lightening enough to see the subject in adequate light. Had it been shot in RAW the background would have been able to have been isolated in a layer, kept at a manageable exposure level while adjusting the brightness in the foreground for the subject. This is a perfect example why so many of us shoot in raw today. The jpeg is acceptable for perhaps an advertisment, but not for a high quality print in your home or office.  The take away is get comfortable shooting in raw, until it becomes second nature.

Expand the Sensors Abilities

Remember that setting your camera to the raw mode, gives your camera sensor instructions to include every bit of data it is capable of capturing, as opposed to jpg which is set for a more limited capture.

It may feel at first as if you are not in control, and indeed you are not. But that won't matter in the end, since you'll gain full control back when you ingest the image data from card and camera into Aperture, Lightroom or Adobe's Camera Raw (or ACR). ACR for example, gives you seemingly unlimited tool management choices for producing, or creating, your best image for any media, be it online, file storage or print.

When shooting in jpg your input from the sensor is initially limited to 8 bit data, as opposed to 12 bit data when in raw. Immediately you have instructed your camera to give you less to work with. Less color, less shadow detail, less contrast, less of everything you'll need to produce your best image file. Regardless which raw conversion software you choose, as I've listed above, so long as you have the original raw file, you can try another raw converter to see which one you prefer.

I have found that using Adobe's Photoshop and ACR software produces what I consider to be a prime set of tools for all image uses. If you choose Phase One's Capture One Pro, you are a session Pro who shoots in batch shooting techniques and manage files in bulk. For all the rest of us, Adobe Lightroom or Adobe Photoshop/acr are the defining tools of choice as they cost less and are designed for single image processing, unless you choose their batch tools internally. But certainly Canon's DPP is the free utility from the camera manufacturer itself and comes with the purchase. A very good tool, but far more limited than adding the Adobe tools mentioned.

Whatever you choose, the intent of this article is to convince you that shooting in raw is not only for the professionals anymore. If you decide you want to print truly great prints, not just (to coin a word) Instagramming them, then you'll begin to shoot raw files and take the time to work on them for better results.


1. Note that Apple is discontinuing Aperture and iPhoto in favor of the OS10 Yosemite app called "Photos", (news story link). Adobe is hot on taking up the slack, with a full tutorial on converting all of your images from Aperture to Creative Cloud Lightroom, (news story pdf link).


 



                           



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

From Dull to Dramatic Photography

Shooting Christmas Can be Fun.......or........

Consciousness Coupled with Photography Art

Soft Proofing in Photoshop

Do you ever shoot for free?

Happy Mother's Day Mom

Not Having Much Fun With Photoshop?

Soft Focus your Photos

Photo Use Acronyms Explained

Two very special prints at Fort Vancouver NHS a National Park